Pacific Southwest, Region 9: Superfund
Serving Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations
Carson River Mercury Site
EPA #: NVD980813646
County: Carson City, Churchill, Lyon, Storey, and Washoe
Congressional District: 02
On 10/13/17, this website will no longer be updated. Site information will be migrated to the new web page at: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/carsonrivermercury .
EPA appreciates your patience through this transition. If you have questions, please contact EPA staff listed below.
On this page
Description and History
NPL Listing History
NPL Status: Final
Proposed Date: 10/26/89
Final Date: 08/30/90
The Carson River Mercury Site includes mercury, arsenic, and lead contaminated soils at former mill sites, mercury contamination in waterways adjacent to the mill sites, and mercury contamination in sediments, fish and wildlife over more than a 100-mile length of the Carson River, beginning near Carson City, Nevada and extending downstream to the Lahontan Valley and Carson Sink. Contamination at the site is a legacy of the Comstock mining era of the late 1800s, when mercury was imported to the area for processing of gold and silver ore. Ore mined from the Comstock Lode was transported to mill sites, where it was crushed and mixed with mercury to amalgamate the precious metals. The approximately 236 mills were located in and around Virginia City, Silver City, Gold Hill, Dayton, Six Mile Canyon, Gold Canyon, and adjacent to the Carson River between New Empire and Dayton. During the mining era, an estimated 7,500 tons of mercury were discharged into the Carson River drainage, primarily in the form of mercury-contaminated tailings.
Today, the mercury is in the sediments and adjacent flood plain of the Carson River and in the sediments of Lahontan Reservoir, Carson Lake, Stillwater Wildlife Refuge, and Indian Lakes. Nevada Division of Health advisory recommends no consumption of fish and limited consumption of ducks at the Site due to high levels of mercury. In addition, tailings with elevated mercury levels are still present at and around the historic mill sites, particularly in Six Mile Canyon. EPA, the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP), University of Nevada researchers, and others have carried out studies to determine the extent of contamination, evaluate the human health and ecological risks, and better understand the processes that govern the movement and toxicity of the mercury. To better manage the site investigation and cleanup, EPA has established two Operable Units (OU) for the site. OU 1 consists of the old mill sites and related tailings above the high water mark. OU2 consists of the Carson River flood plain from the area near New Empire Mill to its terminus in the Carson Sink.
Contaminants and Risks
- Surface Water
- Soil and Sludges
- Environmentally Sensitive Area
Surface water, sediments, soil, fish and wildlife at the site are highly contaminated with mercury in some areas along the river's course. The primary human health threats are to children in long-term direct contact with highly-contaminated soils found in tailings piles or at the former mill sites, and individuals who consume contaminated fish or wildlife. The Nevada Division of Health advises that no gamefish or carp be consumed from most of the site. Risks to wildlife are also significant, particularly to fish-eating birds at the top of the food web.
Mercury levels in gamefish in Lahontan Reservoir (e.g., walleye, white bass) routinely exceed the Food and Drug Administration action level of 1 part per million (ppm). In 1998, a walleye had a record-high 16 ppm mercury present in its tissue. Fish from the River and Lahontan Reservoir are regularly tested by EPA's Region 9 Laboratory in conjunction with Nevada Division of Wildlife.
Fish Advisory: Due to elevated levels of methylmercury in fish, the Nevada Division of Health has issued health advisories recommending that no consumption of any fish from Big and Little Washoe Lakes, Lahontan Reservoir, and the Carson River from Dayton downstream to the reservoir. Mercury can cause permanent damage to the nervous system and serious disabilities for developing fetuses and children. Catch and release, swimming, and recreation are safe activities.
For more information, see the Nevada Department of Wildlife's (NDOW's) webpage on Fish Safety and Mercury: http://www.ndow.org/Fish/Fish_Safety/Mercury/.
Carson River Operable Unit 1 (OU1) - After the site was listed on the Superfund National Priorities list, EPA began the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) at the site. In 1991, concerns over the possible exposure of vehicle users to contaminated materials prompted the removal of mercury-contaminated tailings near Dayton, NV. Also in 1991, a second removal action was completed at a park in Dayton. The contaminated materials were transported to a mineral resource recovery facility. The initial phase of the investigation, which lasted from 1993 to 1995, involved the collection and laboratory analysis of hundreds of samples including surface and sub-surface soils, sediments, groundwater, vegetation, garden crops, fish, aquatic and terrestrial life and indoor air. The resulting report, entitled Revised Draft, Human Health Assessment and Remedial Investigation Report (December 1994) evaluates the potential risk to human health from the mercury, arsenic, and lead present in the soil, sediments, surface water, groundwater, and vegetation in the area.
As part of the assessment, EPA established a site-specific cleanup level of 80 ppm mercury for contaminated soils in residential areas. The 80 ppm cleanup level is based on site-specific assumptions about the form of mercury in the soil.
Four areas in Dayton and Silver City, Nevada were found to exceed the 80 ppm soil cleanup level. Approximately 12 homes were located on or adjacent to the contaminated soils. In 1994, EPA developed a proposal to address the risks posed by the contaminated soils in the four areas and asked the public to evaluate the proposal. After considering public comments provided before, during, and after a public meeting held in 1995, EPA adopted its final cleanup plan (i.e., the “Record of Decision”). The plan called for excavation of the contaminated soils to a maximum depth of two feet, backfilling with clean soil, and offsite disposal of the contaminated soil. In one of the four areas, the remedy also included placement of clean soil on top of the contaminated soil in lieu of excavation and backfilling. Both approaches reduce risks by limiting contact with soils containing elevated levels of mercury. The remedy also included restoration and landscaping of contaminated areas after excavation and backfilling.
Between 1995 and 1997, EPA made preparations for the cleanup. EPA completed additional sampling to more precisely identify the extent of soils requiring cleanup; obtained permission from the property owners to proceed with the cleanup; made a decision to demolish five homes to allow a more complete and effective cleanup; reached agreements to compensate the owners and tenants of the residences slated for demolition; negotiated an agreement with the NDEP for payment of the State’s 10% cost-share; carried out preliminary archaeological investigations to comply with Historic Preservation requirements, selected a construction contractor through a competitive bidding process; and secured funding for the cleanup work.
From August 1998 through December 1999, EPA’s contractors carried out cleanup work in Dayton and Silver City. Initial activities consisted of clearing and grubbing of brush, downed tree limbs, personal property, and debris. Ultimately, approximately 9,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil were excavated Most of the soils were disposed at a nearby landfill. Highly elevated mercury contaminated soils (beads of elemental mercury), comprising approximately 500 cubic yards, were transported our of state for treatment at an approved thermal treatment facility. After excavation, clean fill was brought in, re-seeding and landscaping were completed, and measures implemented to control erosion and temporarily irrigate re-seeded areas. Finally, pipelines, fences, walls, and other utilities were replaced or restored, and needed drainage improvements made.
To comply with the National Historic Preservation Act, and avoid or minimize adverse effects to significant archaeological artifacts or features during the cleanup, EPA hired archaeologists and other specialists to inventory and evaluate archaeological remains, test for subsurface archaeological deposits, monitor excavation activities, and analyze and document archaeological discoveries. The results of the investigations are summarized in a two volume report titled “Historical Archaeology of the Carson River Mercury Site, Dayton and Silver City, Nevada" (April 2001).
During cleanup work in one of the contaminated areas, the archaeologist monitoring excavation observed large timbers later identified as part of the foundation of the 19th century Comstock stamp mill building. The surrounding soil, as well as the timbers themselves, contained small pools of elemental mercury. This discovery resulted in a seven month suspension in the cleanup as arrangements were made to handle the pools of mercury and the surrounding highly contaminated soils. The cleanup work is described in detail in the "Remedial Action Report, Carson River Mercury Site" (September 2000). Additionally, the cleanup activity also includes the development of a “Long Term Sampling and Response Plan” to address risks in undeveloped, un-characterized areas identified in the future with elevated levels of mercury.
The Long Term Sampling and Response Plan (“the LTSRP or Plan”) describes the EPA and the NDEP efforts to address risks to public health and the environment from mercury-contaminated soils at the sources of CRMS in Carson City, Washoe, Lyon and Storey Counties. The Plan addresses risks that could result from long-term direct contact with soils having elevated levels of mercury. Long-term contact is most likely in the new, uncharacterized, residential development settings. NDEP has worked on more than 70 development/project proposals, required analyses of soil samples for mercury at approximately 26 developments, and worked with the developers on mitigation at approximately four developments. Mitigation involved covering or capping contaminated soils and occasionally excavation. In the case of waste left in place or not characterized below two feet, EPA and NDEP have negotiated Environmental Covenants to be placed on the deed indicating the actual or potential presence of remaining contamination for future property buyers. EPA's role has been to provide technical assistance to NDEP and occasionally to work directly with the developers and their consultants, to protect families from exposure to site contamination while facilitating economic development.
In 2013, EPA signed an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) adding arsenic (exceeding 32 ppm) and lead (exceeding 400 ppm) to the list of contaminants to be sampled and potentially remediated.
Carson River Operable Unit 2 (OU2) Remedial Investigation - Mercury-contaminated sediments in the Carson River, Lahontan Reservoir, Carson Lake, and Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge are the cause of elevated levels of mercury in fish and wildlife in and near the contaminated areas. The contamination presents a health risk to those who consume mercury-contaminated fish and waterfowl.
EPA-sponsored investigation work began in approximately 1992 in order to provide information needed to support a decision whether to propose cleanup of the contaminated sediments. In 1992, EPA began an ecological assessment of mercury-related impacts in Lahontan Reservoir and upstream portions of the Carson River. The results of the initial ecological assessment are summarized in a report titled “Ecological Risk Assessment Carson River Mercury Site Upstream of Lahontan Dam” (May 1998). That study includes the results of analyses of surface water, sediment porewater, sediment, zooplankton, benthic invertebrates (midges), fish (Sacramento blackfish, carp, walleye), and bird blood and feathers (double-crested cormorants, bank swallows) collected from Lahontan Reservoir. The samples were collected in 1994 and 1995. One of the findings of the assessment was that fish-eating birds and possibly other wildlife at the site were exposed to levels of mercury contamination shown to cause harm to wildlife in other studies.
In 1997, EPA began a study to test the findings of the 1994-95 assessment and look for more direct evidence of mercury-related adverse impacts. This “ecological effects” study, carried out with researchers at the USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center in Corvallis, Oregon and the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center in Laurel, Maryland, examined the effects of mercury-contaminated water, sediment, and prey on the reproductive success and health of three species of fish-eating birds nesting at the site. The study focused on fish-eating birds because mercury bioconcentrates, reaching the highest levels in organisms at the top of the food web. Eggs and blood samples were collected annually from areas of the site where exposure to mercury was most likely to exceed safe levels, to evaluate year-to-year variability in exposure and to look for relationships between mercury exposure and nesting success. In 1997 and 1998, young nestlings and adult birds were also collected and examined to identify any sublethal effects of mercury exposure in vital organs and tissues.
The effort to correlate the reproductive success of egrets and herons with their exposure to mercury was inconclusive, due to limited sample size and the greater importance of other factors on reproductive success. Measurements of biochemical markers associated with mercury exposure and histopathological examinations have, however, revealed potentially adverse effects on young birds associated with mercury exposure. The significance of the observed changes will be incorporated into EPA's ecological risk assessment.
The ecological risk assessment at the Carson River site has been much more extensive than is typical at Superfund sites, in part because of the absence of any simple or inexpensive cleanup options for the contaminated sediments over such an extensive distance (i.e., more than 100 miles of the river).
Since 1997, most of the investigation work was conducted though agreements with the US Geological Survey, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and university researchers. In addition to the ecological effects study carried out in cooperation with the USGS, studies were completed to examine: i) the formation and degradation of methylmercury in contaminated sediments; ii) whether contaminated sediments in Lahontan Reservoir are a significant source of mercury to wildlife; iii) the transport of mercury in Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge; and iv) loadings of mercury into and from the Lahontan Reservoir.
In 2013 / 2014, EPA conducted an Optimization Review of the years of investigation data to prioritize and identify significant data gaps. This was needed prior to concluding the characterization and starting the final Remedial Investigation (RI) report. To make the cleanup more manageable and address the distinct regions, EPA has divided the river into these four subunits of Operable Unit 2:
A) Mexican Dam (near Carson City) to the Six Mile Canyon Alluvial Fan;
B) Six Mile Canyon Alluvial Fan to the Lahontan Reservoir Dam;
C) the river downstream of the Lahontan Reservoir Dam, including the agricultural canals; and
D) the Terminal Wetlands and Carson Sink, including Carson and Indian Lakes.
OU2 Remedial Investigation Report EPA released the Final Remedial Investigation (RI) Report on April 26, 2017 after extensive review by our agency and non-governmental organization partners. The RI gathered critical environmental information to help understand the nature and extent of the site contamination and the risks to the community. Additionally, the RI pulled together the site information necessary to evaluate cleanup options. Data spanning more than 30 years, more than 20,000 pieces of data from more than 2,300 unique locations were considered. The report includes; the Final RI Report, the Human Health Risk Assessment (Appendix B), and the Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment (Appendix C). All three reports are available as individual links below. EPA has started the Feasibility Study (FS), with a public brainstorming session in Carson City February 22, 2017, seeking input on the array of alternatives to evaluate. The FS will evaluate the costs and benefits of cleaning up the mercury, arsenic and lead contamination in the river, reservoir, and wetlands and determine what type of cleanup, if any, is warranted. The FS is expected by mid-2018.
Cleanup Results to Date
Excavation and removal of mercury-contaminated tailings and soils from the Carson River Mercury Site have reduced the potential for exposure to contaminated soil while further studies are taking place.
Potentially Responsible Parties
Potentially responsible parties (PRPs) refers to companies that are potentially responsible for generating, transporting, or disposing of the hazardous waste found at the site.
No PRPs have been named for contamination at the site.
Documents and Reports
|05/20/13||Fish advisory map|
|06/08/16||Community Involvment Plan|
|08/31/91||EPA Update on the Carson River Mercury Superfund Site|
|09/30/92||Carson River Mercury Investigation Continues|
|04/25/11||Archaeological Studies of Historic Mill Sites|
|02/20/13||EPA Conducting Five-Year Review of Cleanup Actions|
|06/27/17||General Location - Operable Units 1 and 2|
|09/27/13||Explanation of Significant Differences|
|09/30/03||First Five-Year Review Report for the Carson River Mercury Superfund Site|
|09/30/08||Second Five-Year Review Report for the Carson River Mercury Superfund Site|
|09/27/13||Third Five-Year Review Report for the Carson River Mercury Superfund Site|
|04/26/17||Final Human Health Risk Assessment, Operable Unit 2|
|04/26/17||Final Remedial Investigation Report, Operable Unit 2 (surface water, sediment and biota)|
|04/26/17||Final Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment, Operable Unit 2|
Public Meetings: EPA recognizes that communities have the right to be involved in the decisions that affect their lives. EPA’s experience has been that when the public is involved in EPA’s work, the cleanup process results in a better outcome and a more robust remedy. For additional details on how EPA and NDEP will involve the community, review the CRMS Community Involvement Plan.
Public Information Repositories
The public information repositories for the site are at the following locations:
Dayton Valley Library
321 Old Dayton Valley Road
Dayton, NV 89403
Nevada State Library
100 Stewart Street
Carson City, NV 89710
Churchill County Library
553 South Maine Street
Fallon, NV 89406
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) Carson River Mercury Superfund site overview webpage: https://ndep.nv.gov/environmental-cleanup/superfund/carson-river-mercury-superfund-site.
Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW) Fish Safety and Mercury website: http://www.ndow.org/Fish/Fish_Safety/Mercury/.
EPA Site Manager
Mail Code SFD
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
EPA Community Involvement Coordinator
Mail Code SFD-6-3
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
EPA Public Information Center
901 South Stewart Street
Carson City, NV 89701-5249
Carson City, NV 89701
After Hours (Emergency Response)