Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA

Title

  1. Home
  2. Environmental Appeals Board
  3. General Electric Company, Grand Street Mercury Site docket

General Electric Company, Grand Street Mercury Site


StatusClosed
File Date03/01/2005
Appeal Number(s)CERCLA 106(b) 05-01; CERCLA 106(b) 05-03
Docket NumberII-CERCLA-97-0108
II-CERCLA-98-0108
Statute(s)Comprehensive Emergency Response Compensation and Liability Act
Type106(b)
Index of Filings
  • #1 - 03/01/2005 - Petition for Reimbursement
  • #1.1 - 03/01/2005 - Petition for Reimbursement (Exhibits 1 thru 23 HARD COPY ONLY)
  • #2 - 03/04/2005 - Letter to Delmar Karlen, Jr. Region 2, Requesting Response to the Petition for Reimbursement
  • #3 - 03/04/2005 - Concurrences Sheet -- Letter to Delmar Karlen, Jr. Region 2, Requesting Response to the Petition for Reimbursement (HARD COPY ONLY)
  • #4 - 04/01/2005 - Unopposed Motion to Stay Epa's Respose to the Petition for Reimbursement of General Electric Company Pending Epa's Determination of Completion of Response Actions Required to Be Performed by Petitioner.
  • #5 - 04/06/2005 - Order Granting in Part Motion for Stay and Order to Show Cause Why Petiton for Reimbursement Should Not Be Dismissed in Part as Premature.
  • #6 - 04/21/2005 - Declaration of Samuel I. Gutter in Support of General Electric Company's Response to the Environmental Appeals Board's Order to Show Cause Why Petition for Reimbursement Should Not Be Dismissed In Part As Premature
  • #7 - 04/21/2005 - General Electric Company's Response to the Environmental Appeals Board's Order to Show Cause Why Petition for Reimbursement Should No Be Dismissed In Part As Premature
  • #8 - 05/11/2005 - Order Dismissing Petition in Part Without Prejudice
  • #9 - 07/15/2005 - Status Report
  • #10 - 07/18/2005 - Order Granting Second Extension of Time
  • #11 - 09/01/2005 - Status Report
  • #12 - 10/14/2005 - GE Company's Petition for Reimbursement under Section 106(b)(2) of the CERCLA and Unopposed Motion to Stay Further Proceedings Pending Settlement
  • #13 - 10/18/2005 - Consolidation Order and Order Granting Stay
  • #14 - 01/17/2006 - Status Report
  • #15 - 04/17/2006 - Status Report
  • #16 - 07/18/2006 - Status Report
  • #17 - 10/18/2006 - Status Report
  • #18 - 11/29/2006 - General Electric Company's Dismissal of Petitions for Reimbursement Under Section 106(b)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980
  • #19 - 12/05/2006 - Order Dismissing Petitions with Prejudice

Print Index

Environmental Appeals Board

  • EAB Home Page
  • EAB Dockets & Decisions
  • Federal Court Review
  • Rules & Standing Orders Governing Appeals
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Electronic Filing
  • Upcoming Oral Arguments
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • General Information
Contact Us
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.Last updated on May 20, 2026
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshots
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.

Last updated on May 20, 2026