Environmental Economics

Control Strategy Evaluation Using Models

Three strategies for attaining the same air quality standard for the St. Louis airshed are investigated and compared using computer modeling techniques. A least-cost strategy obtained with a linear programming model is found to offer substantial cost savings over a set of emission standards applied uniformly, without regard to a plant's location within the airshed, its contribution to air quality violations, or its costs of control. A strategy based on the rollback assumption was found to attain the target air quality standard, but with some overcontrol and substantial added costs for control of sulfur dioxide.

  • Keywords

    Subject:
    2. Cost-Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis
    2. Cost-Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis - Major Programs and Media
    2. Cost-Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis - Methodology
    Environmental Media:
    a. Air
    a. Air - Mobile Source
    a. Air - Stationary Source
    a. Air - Tropospheric
    Authors:
    Lewis, Donald H.
    Plotkin, Steven E.
    EPA Project Officer/ Manager:
    Geographic Area:
    Study Purpose:
    Empirical Application, Data Development, Policy Evaluation
    Inventory Record #: EE-0346
  • Participating Organizations

    Research Organization:

    Environmental ProtectionAgency, Office of Research and Monitoring, Implementation Research Division, Standards Research BranchAddress:
    City: Washington State: DC ZIP: 20460
    Phone: Fax:
    E-mail:
  • Report Details
    Type:
    Final
    Date:
    05/01/1972
    Number of Pages:
    65
    Comment:
  • How to Obtain Report

    Order a copy of report


Planned Additional Distribution Channels:
Planned Availability Date for Additional Distribution Channels