- Application and/or certifications are not signed by or “for” the Authorized Representative.
|  |
- Travel and/or training costs are not sufficiently justified or detailed.
|
- Required certifications are missing or not completed correctly.
|  |
- Need for budget items is not clearly explained.
|
- Detailed Budget does not match with the SF-424A..
|  |
- Costs in the budget are not allowable either by regulation, applicable cost principles or grant program guidance.
|
- Quality Assurance Requirement is not appropriately addressed.
|  |
- Indirect cost rate is applied incorrectly or approved cost rate agreement has expired.
|
- Budget items cannot be linked to work plan tasks (and vice versa).
For example:
- Work plan contains tasks that are not supported in the budget (tasks requiring specific budget elements that are not present).
- No mention of travel in the work plan, but travel is included in the budget.
- Tasks in work plan not identified as being performed by contractors or consultants, but contractual funding is included in the budget.
- Work plan is inconsistent with the grant program guidance.
|  |
- Work plan is too vague or generic.
For example:
- Goals and objectives are not clearly defined.
- Deliverables and outputs are not identified in the work plan.
- Tasks are not clearly identified and explained (usually vague) to show how the tasks will help accomplish project goals and objectives.
|