Skip common site navigation and headers
US EPA
RCRA Online
Begin Hierarchical Links You are here: EPA Home >> Wastes >> Information Sources >> RCRA Online >> Document Record Detail End Hierarchical Links
Welcome What's New Topics Full Text Search Advanced Search Help

Document Record Detail



Full Document:
Title:SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
RCRA Online Number:13155
Date:03/30/1988
To:Directors, Regions 1-10
From:Lowrance
Organization of Recipient:EPA
Description: Samples taken from turbid groundwater may not be valid. Proper well development requires that wells be clay and silt free. Discusses the use of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in well construction, the calculation of purge volume, and Part 264, Appendix IX. An accelerated groundwater monitoring schedule can be used to bring a facility into compliance. The maintenance of a groundwater monitoring network may include the redevelopment of a well. Well maintenance should be included as a permit condition. Replacement units (e.g. landfills and surface impoundments) must be retrofitted to meet the minimum technological requirements. If a proposed alternative to a double liner does not meet the requirements of 264.221(c), the location characteristics or operating practices must compensate for the deficiency. A redundant flexible membrane bottom liner may be equivalent to the 3004(o)(5)(B) interim statutory design, thus meeting the 3004(o)(1) minimum technological requirements. Addresses the use of the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model v. Moore’s Equation for calculating leachate volume when designing a collection system, the proposed modifications to the cap design to reduce erosion potential, and the use of a test plot to support alternative landfill design cover. A high-density polyethylene liner must be supported by a stable base. An owner of a petroleum refinery undertaking a land treatment demonstration must fully characterize the waste, including addressing the Skinner List constituents in the waste analysis plan. A properly conducted land treatment demonstration should include an evaluation of the waste degradation, transformation, and immobilization, as well as a toxicity study. A land treatment unit cannot accept sludges containing high concentrations of water if the soil moisture conditions cause saturation of the unit. Discusses the selection of principal hazardous constituents for a land treatment unit. An owner of a land treatment unit who has not demonstrated satisfactory treatment of hazardous constituents may need to close the unit. Addresses the presence of a high water table at a land treatment unit and the possible responses. An owner of an existing interim status land treatment unit may be eligible for an immediate full-scale permit if the land treatment demonstration addresses all of the necessary requirements. In states that are authorized for the RCRA base program but not for the HSWA provisions, construction cannot begin at a new facility until both the state and EPA permits are issued. The land disposal restrictions (LDR) program is a self-implementing portion of HSWA, superseding the permit as a shield provision. Permit content should be edited for applicability, importance, clarity, and precision prior to issuance. A minimum detection limit (MDL) can be used to establish background as a groundwater protection standard. Any component required in a RCRA facility investigation (RFI), such as monitoring releases not requiring immediate response, should be included as a permit condition. Monitoring wells installed as part of a HSWA corrective action may be designated as point of compliance wells. Permits containing corrective action conditions for groundwater treatment programs must specify methods of handling groundwater containing hazardous waste and must include pumping and removal requirements. Air stripping may not be an appropriate treatment method for groundwater contaminated with methyl isobutyl ketone. A permit or 3008(h) order should address the air emissions from treatment units such as an air stripper. Includes criteria for the referral of facilities to the Agency for Toxic Substances aND DISEASE REGISTRY (ATSDR) UNDER 3019. Emerging technologies, such as in-situ bio-reclamation, should be demonstrated as effective in pilot-scale field studies prior to approval. 264 Subpart F compliance monitoring standards should be applied to the verification monitoring at solid waste management units (SWMUs) during corrective action. A HSWA corrective action pe
rmit may include a technical feasibility clause discontinuing the program once contaminant levels can no longer be reduced. EPA discourages the approval of a waiver allowing the disposal of nonhazardous waste in a landfill that has lost interim status.
Regulatory Citation(s) : 264.92, 270.14(c), 264.97, 264.98, 264.99, 264.101, 264.221(c), 264.270, 264.272, 264.301, 264.310(a), 265.270, 268.1, 270.1, 270.4(a)(2), 270.10(f), 270.14(b)(2), 270.14(c), 270.20, 270.21, 271.13 EXIT disclaimer
Statutory Citation(s):NA Read US Code 42, Chapter 82 EXIT disclaimer
Topic(s):Hazardous Waste; TSDFs; Permits and Permitting; Disposal; Landfills; Land Disposal Units; Surface Impoundments; Characteristic Wastes; Delisting Petitions; Land Treatment Units; Petroleum Refining Wastes; Special Wastes; Treatment; TSDFs; State Programs (RCRA); Land Disposal Restrictions; Cleanup (RCRA); Corrective Action (RCRA); Compliance; Enforcement (RCRA); Test Methods
Approximate Number of Hardcopy Pages:20
EPA Publication Number:NA
RPPC Number (if applicable): 9523.00-15
Official OSW Policy:No

 

 
Begin Site Footer

EPA Home | Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us