Regulatory Development and Retrospective Review Tracker
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations Risk and Technology Review
a.k.a. NESHAP RTR for Off-site Waste MACT (subpart DD)
RIN: 2060-AR47 (What's this?)
Current Phase: Pre-Proposal (What's this?)
In this action EPA will perform the risk and technology review for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations. The Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) require EPA to conduct residual risk and technology reviews.
|NPRM: Published in FR||07/02/2014|
|NPRM: Comment Period Open||07/02/2014|
|NPRM: Comment Period Closed||08/18/2014|
|Final Rule: Published in FR||03/2015 (projected)|
Of the potential effects described in Reg DaRRT, none are anticipated at this time.
Comment Period Open (07/02/2014 until 08/18/2014) - Click to access the document on Regulations.gov and comment by clicking "Submit Comment" near the top of the Regulations.gov page.
Some of EPA's rulemakings undergo regulatory review (What's this?), as prescribed by Executive Order 12866 and coordinated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The following list describes which of this rulemaking's stages have completed review and published in the Federal Register, if any, and provides links to the review documents where available. Consult the "Timeline" section of this Web page for the dates of each review.
- NPRM - This stage of the rulemaking underwent review.
- Final Rule - This stage of the rulemaking underwent review.
Federal Register Citations
- NPRM: 79 FR 37849
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Citation
40 CFR 63
Clean Air Act Section 112
This site provides summaries of priority rulemakings and priority retrospective reviews of existing regulations. We update most of the site at the beginning of each month, though some data is updated more frequently if it is time sensitive. The information on this site is not intended to and does not commit EPA to specific conclusions or actions. For example, after further analysis, EPA may decide the effects of a rule would be different or it may decide to terminate a rulemaking.