Economic Incentives for Pollution Control: by Geographic Area

Alabama
	4.2.2. Direct Discharge Fees
	TABLE 3-1: QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF POTENTIAL SAVINGS FROM USING ECONOMIC INCENTIVES TO CONTROL AIR POLLUTION
	TABLE 4-2: STATE EFFLUENT FEES AS OF DECEMBER 1993
Alaska
	4.2.2. Direct Discharge Fees
	TABLE 4-2: STATE EFFLUENT FEES AS OF DECEMBER 1993
Arizona
	4.2.2. Direct Discharge Fees
	5.3. LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
	TABLE 3-1: QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF POTENTIAL SAVINGS FROM USING ECONOMIC INCENTIVES TO CONTROL AIR POLLUTION
	TABLE 4-2: STATE EFFLUENT FEES AS OF DECEMBER 1993
	TABLE 5-3: MANDATORY LEAD-ACID BATTERY DEPOSIT SYSTEMS
	TABLE 7-16: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION WATER SUBSIDIES
Arkansas
	4.2.2. Direct Discharge Fees
	4.7. WETLAND COMPENSATION FEES
	5.3. LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
	TABLE 4-2: STATE EFFLUENT FEES AS OF DECEMBER 1993
	TABLE 5-3: MANDATORY LEAD-ACID BATTERY DEPOSIT SYSTEMS
Australia
	EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
	11.1.1. Waste
	11.1.3.2. Effluent Charges
	11.1.5. Charges on Environmentally Damaging Products and Activities
	11.1.5.3. Preferential Taxation of Environmentally Friendly Products
	11.2. DEPOSIT-REFUND MECHANISMS
	11.3. MARKETABLE PERMIT SYSTEMS
	11.3.2. Water Pollution
	11.3.3. Water Use Rights

Local Navigation

• NCEE Home
• Publications
• Careers & Internships
• Grants & Funding
• Events
• Internet Links
• About NCEE

• EPA Home
• Privacy and Security Notice
• Contact Us