Savings from Using Economic Incentives: by Geographic Area

Quick Links


Argentina
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Arizona
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
Arkansas
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
Baltimore
	2.4. Environmental Effects of Incentive Approaches
Belize
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Bolivia
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Buenos Aires
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
California
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
	3.2.1. Air Emissions Trading
Colorado
	3.3.4. Effluent Trading Programs
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Colorado Springs
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Connecticut
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
Costa Rica
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Czech Republic
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Delaware
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.2.1. Air Emissions Trading
Downers Grove (IL)
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Eastern United States
	3.2.6. Regional Nitrogen Oxides Trading Program
Glendale
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Global
	3.2.2. Chlorofluorocarbon Taxes and Allowance Trading
Grand Rapids
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Hoffman Estates (IL)
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Honduras
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Idaho
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
Illinois
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Indonesia
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Iowa
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Japan
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Kazakstan
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Kyoto
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Lansing (MI)
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Maine
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
Massachusetts
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.2.1. Air Emissions Trading
Mexico
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Michigan
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
	3.2.1. Air Emissions Trading
Minnesota
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
New Jersey
	3.2.1. Air Emissions Trading
New York
	2.4. Environmental Effects of Incentive Approaches
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
Nicaragua
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
North Carolina
	3.3.4. Effluent Trading Programs
Oakland
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Oregon
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Ozone nonattainment areas
	3.2.7.4. Oxygenated Fuels Requirement
Panama
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Pasadena
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Portland
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Rhode Island
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
Rio de Janeiro
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Russia
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
San Jose
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Santa Monica
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
South Africa
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
South Carolina
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
Southern California
	3.2.4. RECLAIM
	3.2.1. Air Emissions Trading
	3.2.7.3. Vehicle Scrapping
Spokane
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Sri Lanka
	4.2. Cost Savings from Incentive Systems for Greenhouse Gas Emission Control
Sweden
	2.4. Environmental Effects of Incentive Approaches
Tacoma
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Texas
	3.2.1. Air Emissions Trading
United States
	Executive Summary
	3.3.2. Liability Provisions
	3.2.3. Acid Rain Allowance Trading
	5. Conclusions: Opportunities for Cost Savings
Vermont
	3.4.2. Beverage Container Deposits
Washington
	3.4.3. Lead-Acid Battery Deposits
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
Wisconsin
	3.3.4. Effluent Trading Programs
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste
	3.2.1. Air Emissions Trading
Woodstock (IL)
	3.4.1. Marginal Cost Pricing for Household Waste

Show All Entries

Savings from Using Economic Incentives: by Geographic Area

Quick Links

Local Navigation