Jump to main content.

Mortality Effects of Regulatory Costs and Policy Evaluation Criteria

Quick Links

Media

Subject

Author

New Records

Research Organization

New Downloads

Title

Series Title

Purpose

Subject Downloadable

Title (Downloadable)

Geographic Area

powered by Google

Show details for KeywordsKeywords
Show details for Participating OrganizationsParticipating Organizations
Show details for Report DetailsReport Details
Show details for Published OutputPublished Output
Hide details for SummarySummary
This journal article argues that risk regulations directly reduce risks, but that they may produce offsetting risk increases. Regulated risks generate a substitution effect, as individuals' risk-averting actions will diminish. Recognition of these effects alters benefit-cost criteria and the value-of-life estimate pertinent to policy analysis. Particularly expensive risk regulations may be counterproductive. The expenditure level that will lead to the loss of one statistical life equals the value of life divided by the marginal propensity to spend on health. Regulations with a cost of $30 million to $70 million per life saved will, on balance, have a net adverse effect on mortality because of these linkages. The reference to the journal article can be found under published output above.


Hide details for How to Obtain ReportHow to Obtain Report

Order a copy of report


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.