 | Title | | Report /Research Author | Research Organization | |
|---|
 | Albuquerque |
| |
|
| |
| Arizona |
| |
|
| |
| Atlanta |
| |
|
| |
| Baltimore |
| |
|
| |
| Boulder (CO) |
| |
|
| |
| Canada |
| |
|
| |
| Benefits From Improvement in Chesapeake Bay Water Quality, Volume III of Benefit Analysis Using Indirect or Imputed Market Methods (04/01/1988) |  | Bockstael, Nancy E.
McConnell, Kenneth E.
Strand, Ivar E. | Maryland, University of, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics | |
| Measuring the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Recreation Demand Models, Volume II of Benefit Analysis Using Indirect or Imputed Market Methods (10/01/1989) | | Bockstael, Nancy E.
Hanemann, W. Michael
Strand, Ivar E. | Maryland, University of, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics | |
| Chicago |
| |
|
| |
| Cleveland |
| |
|
| |
| Columbus |
| |
|
| |
| Dallas |
| |
|
| |
| Delaware |
| |
|
| |
| Denver |
| |
|
| |
| Downers Grove (IL) |
| |
|
| |
| Elizabeth (NJ) |
| |
|
| |