Jump to main content.

What Determines Environmental Performance at Paper Mills? The Roles of Abatement Spending, Regulation, and Efficiency

Quick Links

NCEE Working Papers by Year

NCEE Working Papers by Authors

NCEE Working Papers by Subject

Paper Number: 2003-03

Document Date: 04/16/2003

Authors: Ronald J. Shadbegian, Wayne B. Gray

Subject Areas: Air Pollution; Costs of Pollution Control; Environmental Policy

Keywords: Environmental Performance; Pollution Abatement Capital Stock; Air Pollution Emissions; Productive Efficiency

Abstract: This paper examines the determinants of environmental performance at paper mills, measured by air pollution emissions per unit of output. We consider differences across plants in air pollution abatement expenditures, local regulatory stringency, and productive efficiency. Emissions are significantly lower in plants with a larger air pollution abatement capital stock: a 10 percent increase in abatement capital stock appears to reduce emissions by 6.9 percent. This translates into a sizable social return: one dollar of abatement capital stock is estimated to provide an annual return of about 75 cents in pollution reduction benefits. Local regulatory stringency and productive efficiency also matter: plants in non-attainment counties have 43 percent lower emissions and plants with 10 percent higher productivity have 2.5 percent lower emissions. For pollution abatement operating costs we find (puzzlingly) positive, but always insignificant, coefficients

Attachment: 2003-03.pdf

Journal Publication:Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1, Article 15.


Return to Previous Page

Local Navigation


Jump to main content.